Selecting the ideal sputtering target material depends on several key factors, including the conductivity of the sample, intended imaging application, and budget constraints. Most modern SEM sputter coaters have easy target replacement designs, allowing users to switch materials quickly based on specific needs. The recommended process gas is argon for optimal sputtering performance with materials other than gold
Keep in mind that different sample types interact uniquely with coating materials. Both the sputtering target and how the coating interacts with the sample’s surface impact the effectiveness of your SEM coating. Coating non-conductive SEM samples with a highly conductive metal improves imaging by minimizing charging and enhancing contrast. Additionally, many conductive metals provide a higher secondary electron (SE) yield than the uncoated sample, improving resolution.
When selecting a coating:
- Use low atomic number materials (like carbon or titanium) for backscattered electron (BSE) imaging, which relies on atomic contrast.
- Use high atomic number materials (like gold, platinum, or iridium) for secondary electron (SE) imaging, where surface detail is crucial.
Finally, if you plan to perform energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), choose a coating material that is not already present in your sample. This prevents peak overlap in the EDX spectrum and ensures accurate elemental analysis.
Most Common Sputtering Target Materials
The most widely used SEM sputtering targets—Gold (Au), Gold/Palladium (Au/Pd), and Platinum (Pt)—are favored for their reliability, grain size, and consistent performance across general SEM applications. These three materials remain the top choices for achieving high-quality, reproducible SEM images across a wide range of sample types and imaging needs.
| Gold (Au) | Gold is a standard choice for SEM coating, particularly for non-conductive samples. Its low work function enables efficient sputtering with minimal surface heating, even when applied in thin layers using cool sputter coaters. Gold produces visible grain structure even at high magnification and is compatible with benchtop coaters using air as the process gas, making it both versatile and user-friendly. |
| Gold/Palladium (Au/Pd) | The 60/40 Au/Pd alloy is commonly used to achieve finer grain sizes, especially under high vacuum conditions. Though its sputtering rate is slower than pure gold, Au/Pd provides improved surface resolution. However, the performance difference becomes less significant with modern SEM sputter coaters. It’s less ideal for EDX analysis due to overlapping Pd peaks and may not be suitable for heat-sensitive samples. |
| Platinum (Pt) | Platinum delivers an even finer grain size than Au or Au/Pd, making it optimal for high-magnification SEM work. It also offers an excellent secondary electron (SE) yield, enhancing image quality. However, its high work function results in slower sputtering rates, and it is more prone to “stress cracking” in oxygen-rich environments, especially with porous samples. Pt is typically more expensive than gold due to higher production costs. |
Low-Cost Sputtering Target Materials
Budget-friendly sputtering materials suitable for specific SEM applications. Although they may have trade-offs such as oxidation, low sputtering rates, or reduced secondary electron (SE) yield. These materials are ideal for cost-sensitive SEM work where ultra-high resolution or extended stability is not required.
| Copper (Cu) | A cost-effective option for EDX and backscattered electron (BSE) imaging at low to medium magnifications. While its SE yield is low, copper is ideal for educational use and X-ray fluorescence of transition metals. Coatings may include copper oxide but are easily removable with ferric chloride or nitric acid. |
| Nickel (Ni) | An economical alternative for EDX and BSE imaging, though not ideal for SE imaging due to low sputtering rates and poor magnetron compatibility. Coatings often include nickel oxide, which can enhance X-ray fluorescence detection. Easily removed using hydrochloric or nitric acid. |
| Palladium (Pd) | A more affordable alternative to gold, Pd is suitable for low to medium magnification. It provides a weaker SE signal but can be useful in EDX analysis where cost is a factor. |
| Silver (Ag) | A highly conductive, underrated substitute for gold, Ag performs well at low to medium magnification. It offers SE yield slightly below that of Au or Pt but provides similar sputtering rates and finer grain size—except when halogens are present. A major advantage is its easy removal using Farmer’s reducer, allowing post-imaging surface analysis without harsh chemicals. |
| Titanium (Ti) | Though rarely used, Ti is beneficial for reducing interference in EDX and BSE imaging due to its low atomic number. It oxidizes quickly, so samples must be imaged immediately after coating. |
Higher-Cost or Specialized Sputtering Target Materials
These premium sputtering targets offer superior performance for high-resolution and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). However, they often require high-vacuum systems and immediate imaging to avoid oxidation. It is best to reserve these materials for advanced SEM users requiring top-tier imaging precision and equipment.
| Chromium (Cr) | Ideal for FESEM and semiconductor samples, Cr delivers fine grain coatings but requires a turbo-pumped coater with a target shutter. It oxidizes quickly, so samples must be imaged immediately or stored under vacuum. While it has a lower sputtering rate and SE yield than platinum or iridium, Cr excels in backscattered electron (BSE) imaging of low atomic number and biological samples. |
| Iridium (Ir) | A top-tier choice for ultra-fine grain coatings across most materials. Iridium is non-oxidizing, making it reliable for high- and ultra-high-resolution imaging. Its high SE yield and stability outperform Cr, especially in FESEM. |
| Platinum/Palladium (Pt/Pd) | This 80/20 alloy offers a grain size and SE yield similar to pure platinum, but with better resistance to “stress cracking.” It’s a versatile option for thin coatings in FESEM applications, especially when using high-resolution sputter coaters. |
| Tantalum (Ta) | Suitable for high-resolution coatings, Ta provides fine grains and a high SE yield due to its high atomic number. However, it oxidizes quickly and must be imaged promptly or stored in a vacuum. It sputters slowly, similar to Cr. |
| Tungsten (W) | Known for its ultra-fine grain structure, W is ideal for ultra-high-resolution imaging. Though it oxidizes rapidly and has a low sputtering rate, its high atomic number ensures strong SE yield. Like Cr and Ta, immediate imaging or vacuum storage is essential. |
Conclusion
Selecting the optimal sputtering target material is a critical step in achieving optimal coating results in your process. Consider factors like electrical conductivity, chemical reactivity, purity, and compatibility with your deposition goals. Then, you can make informed decisions that enhance both research and production outcomes. Atomic LVL can support your process when sourcing or selecting sputtering targets, .
Leave a Reply